|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [VTD-NEO][patch 0/6] Intel VT-d/Neocleus 1:1 mreged code
On 5/9/07 01:08, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The following 6 patches contains merge of Intel VT-d and Neocleus' 1:1
> mapping patches for enabling HVM guest direct device access that were
> last submitted around end of May. These patches applied cleanly to
> changeset 15730.
The 'include' patch doesn't apply any more, and in any case needs splitting
up logically (vtd bits go in vtd patch; neo bits in neo patch; any generic
bits in xen patch). The 'pt' (neo) code looks to throw way too much stuff in
include/xen/ of which I suspect most is private definitions that really
belong in the pt/ directory. Also consider which bits should be in
include/asm rather than include/xen.
The presence of the E820_1TO1 stuff makes me suspect that the 1:1 area
allocation hasn't been cleaned up as much as it should have been. There
shouldn't be any need to modify Xen's permanent e820 map I think.
Haven't looked any further at the Xen parts, but I'll take a look at the
tools patch...
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|