|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xendomain Bug
On 23/7/07 20:09, "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>> The only flaw with yours is that it went to bugzilla only, and was not sent
>> to xen-devel. If you'd sent it to xen-devel it would have gone in. Now, not
>> only has the larger fix gone in, but other patches also have piled on top.
>> So, in future, send patches to xen-devel *as well as* attaching to bugzilla
>> tickets!
>>
>
> Hmm, I wonder what this might be:
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-01/msg00058.html
It's not actually a patch (i.e., in diff format), it didn't have [PATCH] in
the subject (not required, but handy), and it was a cross-list reply in a
mail thread I wasn't reading.
As well as sending that mail, sending a separate one in a new mail thread
with [PATCH] in the subject line, a unified diff format patch attached, and
a signed-off-by line, would definitely get your patch picked up.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|