|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xendomain Bug
On 22/7/07 12:33, "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmm, there is still one question left:
>
> The fix I proposed is a patch of about two lines - as can be seen here:
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=859
>
> The fix you took in was much larger instead - in fact 2 lines vs. 20.
>
> see: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/865c4ae59be3
>
> Is there something totally wrong with the small patch that I oversaw?
>
> Not that I have the urgent need to get my own patches in, but I usually
> tend to think smaller patches should be better, and having less code to
> maintain is better - and if I propose bad things, I want to know about it :)
The only flaw with yours is that it went to bugzilla only, and was not sent
to xen-devel. If you'd sent it to xen-devel it would have gone in. Now, not
only has the larger fix gone in, but other patches also have piled on top.
So, in future, send patches to xen-devel *as well as* attaching to bugzilla
tickets!
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|