|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Question: Dynamic code in x86_64 Xen
 
On 10/7/07 19:47, "Santos, Jose Renato G" <joserenato.santos@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Could you please help me understand some Xen code profile
> that I cannot explain?
> When running netperf on x86_64 Xen, oprofile reports that 2%
> of the PC samples are not recognized (i.e. they correspond
> to code outside the ".text" section reported on xen image
> file). I added some instrumentation in oprofile and observed
> that these PC samples are located in:
> 1) for dom0: in Xen BSS section (more specifically on cpu0_stack)
> 2) for domU: outside any section specified in Xen image file
>  (i.e. dynamically allocated memory)
Yes, these are executions on the stack. This is expected behaviour for
x86_64. The syscall instruction enters Xen via a stack trampoline. This is
because syscall does not switch %rsp for us. Hence using a stack trampoline
cunningly lets us compute %rsp from %rip.
If you see 2% of your samples in the syscall trampoline, this probably
indicates mainly that the processor is spending ~2% of its time doing a
syscall transition (and then the NMI occurs on teh very first instruction
executed in Xen).
 -- Keir
> I suspect case 2 is also a stack for a different CPU which
> is dynamically allocated (and used in the CPU that the guest
> is executing) but I am not sure...
>  
> Anyway, why whould Xen execute any code from the stack? Is
> this expected Xen behavior or this is a bug somewhere
> (probably in xenoprofile)?
> I did not see this behavior in the past when I was using x86_32 Xen.
> Could you please shed some light on this ...
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Lukas Hejtmanek
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Roland Dreier
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Lukas Hejtmanek
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Roland Dreier
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Lukas Hejtmanek
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Roland Dreier
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Lukas Hejtmanek
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Question: Dynamic code in x86_64 Xen, Santos, Jose Renato G
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Question: Dynamic code in x86_64 Xen,
Keir Fraser <=
 - [Xen-devel] RE: Question: Dynamic code in x86_64 Xen, Santos, Jose Renato G
 
    
- Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Roland Dreier
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Roland Dreier
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Question regarding vm creat&boot, tgh
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding SLAB corruption, Roland Dreier
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |