| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Add VMX memory-mapped Local APIC access optimiza
|
To: |
"Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Add VMX memory-mapped Local APIC access optimization |
|
From: |
"Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2007 12:00:38 +0800 |
|
Cc: |
"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 30 May 2007 20:58:58 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<C2836599.FB71%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcdrXcumBW0XNoFFTVuT/E21U2H6Bws8RBpQAqJNTp4AF98f0A== |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [Patch] Add VMX memory-mapped Local APIC access optimization |
Keir,
Thanks a lot for the simplification! :)
I made some simple tests, and verified at least on my host the vTPR feature
really works and the performance of SMP Windows 2003 Guest behaves much better.
-- Dexuan
-----Original Message-----
From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 2007年5月31日 0:32
To: Cui, Dexuan; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Li, Xin B; Dong, Eddie; Nakajima, Jun
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Add VMX memory-mapped Local APIC access
optimization
Applied but I've subsequently 'simplified' it quite a bit. :-) You'll want
to pull it from the staging tree and make sure it actually still works.
-- Keir
On 17/5/07 07:52, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some operating systems access the local APIC TPR very frequently, and we
> handle that using software-based local APIC virtualization in Xen today.
> Such virtualization incurs a number of VM exits from the memory-access
> instructions against the APIC page in the guest.
>
> The attached patch enables the TPR shadow feature that provides APIC TPR
> virtualization in hardware. Our tests indicate it can significantly
> boost the performance of such guests including 32-bit Windows XP/2003.
>
> Moreover, with the patch, local APIC accesses other than TPR in guests
> are intercepted directly as APIC_ACCESS VM exits rather than PAGE_FAULT
> VM exits; this can lower the emulation cost of such accesses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> PS, the related document is available in the latest Intel SDM 3B:
> http://www.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/index.htm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home