|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v2] static and __init symbols in	machine_kexec.c
 
On 16/5/07 07:49, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Curiously, making xen_max_nr_phys_cpus __init causes a section missmatch
> error at compile time. I guess this is to do with the way global ints
> are handled. I confirmed that its consistent across x86_32, x86_64 and
> ia64. So I guess its ok to leave it as is.
What if you make it __initdata, as it (and the other data variables) should
be?
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] static and __init symbols in machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
- [Xen-devel] [Patch v2] static and __init symbols in machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v2] static and __init symbols in	machine_kexec.c,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v2] static and __init symbols in	machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v2] static and __init symbols in	machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
 
- [Xen-devel] [Patch v3] static,	__init and __initdata symbols in machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch v3] static, __init and __initdata symbols in	machine_kexec.c, Ian Campbell
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch v3] static,	__init and __initdata symbols in machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch v3] static, __init and __initdata symbols in machine_kexec.c, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch v3] static,	__init and __initdata symbols in machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
 
  
  
  
- [Xen-devel] [Patch v4] static,	__init and __initdata symbols in machine_kexec.c, Simon Horman
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |