On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 7:26 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:53:24AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 27/4/07 00:12, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > The _constructDomain call is failing in xc.domain_create() - the code which
>> > deals with ballooning down Domain-0 is not even run yet - that lives in
>> > the _initDomain method. So HVM domain creation is failing before XenD has
>> > even had a chance to do ballooning. If I manually use 'xm mem-set' to
>> > balloon down Domain-0 ahead of time, everything works just fine.
>> >
>> > I'm at a lose to figure out how to solve this without major re-arranging
>> > of the order of _constructDomain & _initDomain work. Perhaps someone can
>> > figure out an easier fix ?
>>
>> I don't think domain_create() allocates very many pages, although it's
>> possible it's making a default allocation of shadow memory. Assuming not, it
>> may be sufficient to make auto-balloon leave a bit of slack memory rather
>> than try to account for all available memory down to the last page. A few
>> pages might turn out to suffice. Does this problem occur with the very first
>> domain you try to create after booting the machine?
>
> It seems to occurr with any HVM guest I try to create, unless there was
> already
> some free mem (from starting & stopping a previous dom). I'm testing with
> this
> very simple hack which seems to make it work - just ensure the balloon driver
> frees a 10 MB chunk right at the start. Hardcoding is fine because when we
> later get to the _initDomain() method we'll definitely be freeing up much
> more than 10 MB for the HVM guests's actual mem requirements.
Keir,
The problem Daniel fixed for fully virtual affects paravirtual, also.
We have received bug reports from ISVs of this problem in both the PV and FV
cases. I traced code paths and discovered that FV attempts to allocate the
most memory during the initial domain creation; 64-bit PV allocates the next
most; 32-bit PV allocates the least. So failures for PV are less common, but
not impossible.
Would you please de-indent the added lines, so both PV and FV guests have the 2
MB slack?
I've been testing such a patch for about a month in our SLES 10 SP1 betas
(based on xen-3.0.4), and it works well.
Thanks.
> --- xen-3.0.5-testing.hg-rc3-14934/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py
>
> 2007-04-26 19:30:11.000000000 -0400
> +++
> xen-3.0.5-testing.hg-rc3-14934.new/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py
> 2007-04-26 19:36:06.000000000 -0400
> @@ -1422,6 +1422,8 @@ class XendDomainInfo:
> raise VmError("HVM guest support is unavailable: is VT/AMD-V
> "
> "supported by your CPU and enabled in your "
> "BIOS?")
> + # Hack to pre-reserve some mem for basic HVM setup
> + balloon.free(10*1024)
>
> self.domid = xc.domain_create(
> domid = 0,
>
>
> Dan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home