Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags

To:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:56:11 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:55:02 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C254EEFE.DD0B%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AceHJlPukmWRSPMZEduM1gAX8io7RQAAgHKE
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] trap bounce flags
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214

On 25/4/07 11:41, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Attached is my own proposed patch which I think cleans up all the issues.
> Checking just flags in asm and keeping the null-bounce check in
> init_int80_direct_trap() seems fine to me.

The change of a movw $0 to a movb $TBF_EXCEPTION in that patch is wrong, by
the way. Should be movb $0.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags, Keir Fraser
Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] HVM Save/Restore status., Petersson, Mats
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags, Keir Fraser
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags, Jan Beulich
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] trap bounce flags