|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32 bit HVM guests
Hi.
Great! Should the PV drivers be built differently since the width
of the physical address
in the hypervisor and dom0 is different from what the hvm guest is
compiled for? I trying
to test this combination and I have hang in the xenbus driver.
Me too. I am running HVM Domain on xen-3.0.4.
In HVM Domain, I executed "modprobe xenbus" command. When it hanged.
And I tried the PV Driver in xen-unstable. xenbus.ko was removed in
xen-unstable.
I executed "modprobe xen-platform-pci" command. When it hanged too.
I checked "xm dmesg" in the Dom0.
May be it was mismatched hypercall:20 in xen-3.0.4 and xen-unstable.
Now I am trying xen-unstable's PV drivers on xen-unstable.
.::.:... .::....: .::...:: .::.:.:: .::..:.: .:::..:.
TAIRA Hajime <htaira-fdr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
web: http://pantora.net/
On 2007/04/12, at 23:43, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:32 AM, in message
<B30DA1341B0CFA4893EF8A36B40B5C5D01044125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>, "Li,
Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
----- Original Message-----
From: xen- devel- bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen- devel- bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ky
Srinivasan
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 10:18 PM
To: xen- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen- devel] 32 bit HVM guests
When we host 32 bit hvm guests on a 64 bit hypervisor, do we
currently support loading 32 bit PV drivers in the HVM guest?
Yes!
- Xin
Great! Should the PV drivers be built differently since the width
of the physical address in the hypervisor and dom0 is different
from what the hvm guest is compiled for? I trying to test this
combination and I have hang in the xenbus driver.
K. Y
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|