|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP
hi
xen does not support numa-aware guest linux, is it right?
and there are memory-hotplug.c and migration.c in the linux2.6.20, does
it means that linux could support the hotplug memory or not ?
if it could ,does linux have to be numa-aware to support memory hotplug
or a smp linux could support memory hotplug?
I am confused about it
could you help me
Thanks in advance
Petersson, Mats 写道:
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ryan Harper
Sent: 23 March 2007 14:43
To: tgh
Cc: Xen Developers; Daniel Stodden
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP
* tgh <tianguanhua@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-03-23 00:48]:
hi
how many nodes in the numa with adm64 does xen support at present?
in xen/include/asm-x86/numa.h:
#define NODE_SHIFT=6
#in xen/include/xen/numa.h:
#define MAX_NUMNODES = (1 << NODE_SHIFT);
which works out to 64 nodes. I don't know if anyone has tested more
than an 8 node system.
Of course, if we're talking AMD64 systems, if a NODE is a socket, the
currently available architecture supports 8 NODES, so there's plenty of
space to grow such a system. I think there's plans to grow this, but I
doubt that the limit above will be reached anytime soon.
Even if a node is a core within a CPU, the current limit of 8 sockets
will limit the number of cores in a system to 32 cores when the
quad-core processors become available. So still sufficient to support
any current architecture.
--
Mats
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, tgh
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP,
tgh <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- [Xen-devel] The context switch overhead comparison between vmexit/vmentry and hypercall., Liang Yang
|
|
|
|
|