|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Ryan Harper
> Sent: 23 March 2007 14:43
> To: tgh
> Cc: Xen Developers; Daniel Stodden
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP
>
> * tgh <tianguanhua@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-03-23 00:48]:
> > hi
> > how many nodes in the numa with adm64 does xen support at present?
>
> in xen/include/asm-x86/numa.h:
> #define NODE_SHIFT=6
>
> #in xen/include/xen/numa.h:
> #define MAX_NUMNODES = (1 << NODE_SHIFT);
>
> which works out to 64 nodes. I don't know if anyone has tested more
> than an 8 node system.
Of course, if we're talking AMD64 systems, if a NODE is a socket, the
currently available architecture supports 8 NODES, so there's plenty of
space to grow such a system. I think there's plans to grow this, but I
doubt that the limit above will be reached anytime soon.
Even if a node is a core within a CPU, the current limit of 8 sockets
will limit the number of cores in a system to 32 cores when the
quad-core processors become available. So still sufficient to support
any current architecture.
--
Mats
>
> --
> Ryan Harper
> Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
> IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
> (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
> ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, tgh
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP,
Petersson, Mats <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, tgh
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- [Xen-devel] The context switch overhead comparison between vmexit/vmentry and hypercall., Liang Yang
|
|
|
|
|