[Xen-devel] Please apply unstable changeset 14220 to 3.0.4...

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Please apply unstable changeset 14220 to 3.0.4...
From:	"Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:08:09 +0100
Cc:	John Hannfield <hal9020@xxxxxxxxx>, Joe Bonasera <joe.bonasera@xxxxxxx>, "Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:08:23 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acdr0x3jmm/D3QEYStSBnpITO0l5hw==
Thread-topic:	Please apply unstable changeset 14220 to 3.0.4...

I have just spent half a day at Sun debugging a 3.0.4 boot problem,
which turns out to be fixed by unstable changeset 14220 (but I only
discovered that after I had figured out what the "fix" was). 

Attached is a copy of "hg export 14220", which applies cleanly to 3.0.4
testing. 

I don't think I need a "signed off" on this, as it's a patch by Keir
originally.

This only happens on machines with more than one socket and that has a
"SLIT" entry in the ACPI tables. 

[As a side-note, I think the macro __va() shoud check that the physical
address is in the valid range to work - in debug mode at least.]

--
Mats

patch.14220
Description: patch.14220

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Please apply unstable changeset 14220 to 3.0.4...