 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] ISA DMA
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] ISA DMA |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:24:17 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:22:53 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
x86-64 excludes i8237.o from being built, while i386 doesn't. Also, for domU-s, there's nothing being done to make request_dma() fail. Any particular reason for either of these? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Red Hat Cluster and Xen, Rami Rosen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Provide HVM guest RTC change notification, Ben Thomas |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Red Hat Cluster and Xen, David Shwatrz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] ISA DMA, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
