xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 14/21] Xen-paravirt: Add XEN config options and d
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 14/21] Xen-paravirt: Add XEN config options and disable unsupported config options. |
From: |
Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:15:27 -0800 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:14:49 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20070216022531.570154735@xxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<20070216022449.739760547@xxxxxxxx> <20070216022531.570154735@xxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206) |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
The XEN config option enables the Xen paravirt_ops interface, which is
installed when the kernel finds itself running under Xen. (By some
as-yet fully defined mechanism, implemented in a future patch.)
Xen is no longer a sub-architecture, so the X86_XEN subarch config
option has gone.
The disabled config options are:
- PREEMPT: Xen doesn't support it
- HZ: set to 100Hz for now, to cut down on VCPU context switch rate.
This will be adapted to use tickless later.
- kexec: not yet supported
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
We do support different HZ values, although 100HZ is actually preferable
for us, so I don't object to that. PREEMPT is supported by us, but not
as tested as I would like, so I also don't object to dropping it for
generic paravirt guests - Rusty - Avi any objections to dropping preempt
in terms of lguest/KVM paravirtualization?
Paravirt-ops definitely needs a hook for kexec, although we should not
disable kexec for the natively booted paravirt-ops. Eric - is there a
way to disable it at runtime?
We do support the doublefault task gate, and it would be good to keep
it, but I can't complain so much if it is gone from generic paravirt
kernels for now, because it is non-essential, and generally fatal
anyway. We do need it for native boots of paravirt-ops kernels,
however, so turning off the config option still needs to be revisited.
Zach
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|