|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue aftervcp
I'm travelling so I'm not getting through the patch queue as quickly as
usual. The patch looks fine -- it may get checked in today.
-- Keir
On 4/2/07 12:30, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keir, how about your opinion about this version? Maybe I missed
> your reply...
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tian, Kevin
>> Sent: 2007年2月2日 21:57
>> To: Tian, Kevin; Keir Fraser; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix
>> softlockup issue aftervcpu hotplug
>>
>> Hi, Keir,
>> Please check whether attached patch matches
>> your suggestion. Test OK with vcpu hotplug and save/restore.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>>
>>> From: Tian, Kevin
>>> Sent: 2007年2月2日 10:49
>>>> Okay, I now see how this works -- the thread is kicked from
>>>> softlockup_tick(), from the timer ISR. So this wakeup event is hidden
>>>> from
>>>> next_timer_interrupt(), which only searches timer wheels and
>> hrtimers.
>>>
>>> Exactly.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The strictly correct fix here is to make next_timer_interrupt()
>>>> softlockup-aware. I would say it is currently incorrect in
>>> the presence of
>>>> softlockup since it is not doing its job (telling an idle
>>> process what the
>>>> next time-based event is that it must wake up for).
>>>>
>>>> We can do this by adding a softlockup_get_next_event(),
>>> called from the
>>>> bottom of next_timer_interrupt(). I would pass it the current
>>> return value
>>>> and have it return an adjusted value: so in the absence of
>>> softlockup it
>>>> would simply return its argument unmodified. In the presence of
>>>> softlockup
>>>> it would return a sooner value if softlockup is the next
>>> event to fire.
>>>>
>>>> Do you want to try coding this up?
>>>>
>>>> -- Keir
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kevin
>>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue aftervcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue aftervcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue aftervcpu hotplug,
Keir Fraser <=
|
|
|
|
|