|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vc
On 2/2/07 01:10, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, am I looking at wrong code? In 2.6.16:
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> msleep_interruptible(1000);
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> }
>
> While in 2.6.18:
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
> schedule();
> }
>
> I don't think same logic kept there. :-)
Fair point! I must have compared two 2.6.16 trees...
Well, that is interesting. I have no idea how SCHED_FIFO/sched_priority=99
interacts with timer wheels and/or tickless idle modes. I wonder why this
was changed at all? Perhaps a question for lkml...
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue aftervcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue aftervcpu hotplug, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue aftervcpu hotplug, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|