 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] A Performance Comparison of Hypervisors
| To: | "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] A Performance Comparison of Hypervisors |
| From: | "Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:36:14 +1300 |
| Cc: | Xen development list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:35:50 -0800 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uTm7eLgZqjY29hEI23Urg26Ez9NUOUUtSqOkEgLw4lPr9HDcy7VVEx1TST70514xlm03f0J1Xw36laoawxKXYLfZuYL23aGwV30/MB8fKuwtzfVIwY6DyQjUpl3yBZ1yzhOClsKgRnboEUEMUmSKeugLHbPGveue7DiUi8g1hQs= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <45C4B500.6000304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <2b6116b30702030134j762eed51ud48dc9567d904e97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45C4B500.6000304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 2/4/07, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I wonder why you say this. I thought the benchmark was done very well. What we need is more benchmarking, not less. Unfortunately, VMware makes publishing benchmarks difficult as you have to get their approval. ... [1] The PV drivers that come in XenEnterprise are, AFAIK, only for XenEnterprise. The person who did the benchmark might have done a brilliant job, but it reads like marketing pamphlet for VMware. A good test show be neutral. Show their best product against Xen's lowest offering is just disrespectful. As you say, the netperf test was silly, a good independent tester wouldn't do something like that. Vmware is very mature. I use both it and Xen and they both work well. Xen certainly works better for some jobs than seems to be presented in that report. Nicholas _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Reuse irq number for virq/ipi after vcpu unplug/plug, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Reuse irq number for virq/ipi after vcpu unplug/plug, Tian, Kevin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] A Performance Comparison of Hypervisors, Anthony Liguori |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] A Performance Comparison of Hypervisors, Mark Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
