|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: [Xen-users] bugzilla.xensource.com
On 1/25/07, Daniele Palumbo <daniele@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:20, Keir Fraser wrote:
> The bugzilla is used largely for tracking issues we already know about and
> are working on. It's not triaged for new bugs as often as it ought to be.
> So if you have an issue, the right thing to do is usually to post to
> xen-users or xen-devel (depending on whether it looks to be a real bug or
> possibly just user error) and then let us know you are creating a bugzilla
> ticket if the issue cannot quickly be resolved.
i have updated http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq with "how to report a
bug".
Cool.
Maybe it's a good idea, to point to that FAQ, or just print this
information on the bugzilla frontpage - I also posted a handful of
bugs recently, without announcing them on xen-devel in addition, and I
also was thinking they will probably be fixed in some future
version. Now I know, without announcing them on devel there's not much
hope, even if patches are attached...
BTW: maybe someone let the email-only communicating developers know
that there is a mailing list that sends out mails on each new bug? :)
And, one last thing: if I'd know that it's easier to get a bugfix in
when I send it in a specific format(maybe mercurial has a mail output,
like darcs?), I surely used that way.
Henning
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|