WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue

To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:53:49 +0100
Cc: Xen devel list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:54:08 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45B0A16C.8080607@xxxxxxx> (Gerd Hoffmann's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:46:04 +0100")
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C1D56D8B.7D71%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45B09570.7000109@xxxxxxx> <87zm8fwbnt.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45B0A16C.8080607@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> [...]
>>> Here is a one-line fix to make the pvfb frontend clear the shared page.
>>>  Can this go into both 3.0.4 and unstable please?
>> 
>> No objections to clearing the shared page, just keep in mind that any
>> scheme to guess the page layout that relies on the page being cleared
>> is playing a dicey game with 3.0.3 frontends.
>
> 3.0.3?  Wasn't pvfb merged in the 3.0.4 cycle?  Or do you talk about
> what FC6 ships?

Sorry, I meant 3.0.4.

> As the 3.0.4 frontends use hard-coded 800x600-32 which needs one page
> directory only I think it is possible to keep them apart even in case
> they don't carry the protocol info ...

Okay.

If that turns out not to work, consider turning depth into your
version number, starting with version 32.  Evil, ugly, but no guessing
games.  New frontends won't work with old backends, but that's okay.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel