Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:34:00PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Actually FC6 isn't a problem - the ABI already changed between the time we 
> > shipped it in FC6, and the time it got merged in xen-devel.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > For RHEL-5 though
> > we have synced to the ABI currently in xen-devel/xen-3.0.4.
> 
> Hmm, assuming we'll fix up the ABI now to be binary compatible between
> 32 and 64 bit and put that one into both 3.0.4 and unstable, could that
> still make it into RHEL-5 or is that too late now?

Not any chance whatsoever I'm afraid :-( We're way too far into the release
process to make any functional changes now.

Regards,
Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: AIO for better disk IO? Re: [Xen-users] Getting better Disk IO, Liang Yang

Next by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: AIO for better disk IO? Re: [Xen-users] Getting better Disk IO, Petersson, Mats

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Gerd Hoffmann

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue, Keir Fraser

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 32-on-64: pvfb issue