|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link
On 3/1/07 15:14, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Why do you strip the symbol table and re-add it in an unusual format
>> when linking the bootable ELF image? Is this a historical relict?
>
> Ah, sorry! I actually meant: Why do you strip the symbol and string tables
> and re-add the string table in an unusal format?
> Is this a historical relict?
It isn't the symbol-name string table: look at how short it is! It's the
section-header string table. I believe all Elf images require one of those
(not least because some section names have special meaning).
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, John Levon
|
|
|
|
|