|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 16:11, Christoph Egger wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 14:57, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > SHT_PROGBITS sections do not use the sh_link field. It's used by
> > symbol-table sections, relocation-entry sections, and suchlike, of which
> > we don't have any. And .shstrtab section is never linked to.
>
> Why do you strip the symbol table and re-add it in an unusual format
> when linking the bootable ELF image? Is this a historical relict?
Ah, sorry! I actually meant: Why do you strip the symbol and string tables
and re-add the string table in an unusal format?
Is this a historical relict?
Christoph
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|