|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information
|
To: |
"Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>, John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information |
|
From: |
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Dec 2006 07:38:49 +0000 |
|
Cc: |
"Yu, Wilfred" <wilfred.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen devel list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yang, Fred" <fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@xxxxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:38:51 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<5461330FA59EDB46BE9AB8AAF2C431AD0287D4D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
Accdfoc0GRLPeHB9QVCU3IZatg004QABSxZgAA83HIg= |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
On 12/12/06 12:26 am, "Kamble, Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. The situation is, dom0 may not see all the
> processors in the system. Only hyper visor is capable of seeing all. I
> would let tools/apps on dom0 to see information about CPUs assigned to
> dom0, not the whole set available in the system. So it is necessary to
> have a hyper visor specific interface, and in my opinion xm is the best
> choice for that.
A strong argument against 'xm cacheinfo' and the required extra hypercall is
that x86 cache hierarchies are always symmetric, to the best of my
knowledge. So it does not matter which CPU dom0 happens to interrogate for
cache info -- the information can be extrapolated to all other CPUs in the
system. So the admin can run one of the many little tools that can be
downloaded and that dump out interesting CPUID information. The physical CPU
topology hypercall (i.e., the smaller half of your patch) is more
interesting to me.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Export Multicore information, Kamble, Nitin A
|
|
|
Home