Could this be the cause of the spurious interrupts that I reported yesterday?
-- Ross
>>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 3:03 AM, in message
<C16789EF.3611%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser
<Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 27/10/06 9:30 am, "He, Qing" <qing.he@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> Yes, but why does the guest set only this PCI device's IRQ to
>>> edge- triggered? Why not the rtl8139, for example? Neither is explicitly
>>> listed in the MP tables, so where does this differing behaviour come from?
>>>
>>> -- Keir
>>
>> Per my understanding, rtl8139 works fine even if it is edge- triggered,
> because
>> there is no interrupt sharing. So if there is no platform pci device, it is
>> possible for guest to set all devices to edge triggered without complaining
>> anything. (I do know that if I comment out sanity checks in HV, platform pci
>> device works fine in edge triggered mode, and there will be no complaints.)
>
> Oh sorry, I see that check is specific to the platform- device IRQ. I guess
> it should be reduced just to a printk warning, and we should work out what
> needs adding to the MP tables to get the PCI devices set up with
> level- triggering.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen- devel mailing list
> Xen- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen- devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home