WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests

To: Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RESEND] PV drivers for HVM guests
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:03:32 +0100
Cc: Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:05:51 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200610250311.k9P3BwF04686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4535F8F5.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> Your message of Wed, 18 Oct 2006 07:51:45 -0600. <4535F8F5.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <200610182356.k9INuAF03840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45374AE9.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> Your message of Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:53:42 -0600. <45374AE9.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <200610201012.k9KACIF29714@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45389CA5.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <200610230145.k9N1jGF01307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <453D8055.4030509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1161703595.22514.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200610242354.k9ONsIF02543@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200610250311.k9P3BwF04686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 12:11 +0900, Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>   I've met a compile error about gfp_t in rhel4.4. Thus, I avoided to meet
> the compile error with preliminary patch like below.

Oh, you mean you were seeing problems because gfp_t is backported to
RHEL 4.4? I thought your patch was adding the typedef but actually you
are conditionally removing it.

I not sure the typedef is needed at all -- nothing in unmodified_drivers
uses gpf_t as far as I can see. My current patchset doesn't define it at
all and builds ok on RHEL4.4. Perhaps it is an arch specific issue?

Cheers,
Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>