|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Base kernel version
Hi;
Sorry for if this was discussed before, i can't find any releated discussion
in archives and i just subscribed to the list.
Is there any specific reason to depend 2.6.16.x tarball instead of 2.6.16 one?
Lots of distro seems uses this approach to their kernel packages and add .x
releases as a patch into their packages. Incremental updates always seems
good to me :)
What do you think about changing LINUX_VER to 2.6.16 and adding
patch-2.6.16.29 into patches/?
Cheers
--
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
pgpKIUv217VII.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] Base kernel version,
S.Çağlar Onur <=
|
|
|
|
|