|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch rfc 1/3] xen arch header rework.
 
On 11/10/06 11:40, "Jacob Gorm Hansen" <jacobg@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I like this approach (although I don't like Perl, but at least it's better
>> than reams of bash, which is definitely the pits ;-). The Solaris guys won't
>> like the gcc attributes, but they can add some flexibility to the script to
>> target the pragmas/extensions of their own compiler.
> 
> Xen seems committed to using Python already (not that I am too
> thrilled about that, but at least Python code is readable to the
> occasional hacker), could we try to limit the amount of arcane
> scripting languages that have to be supported when building Xen, i.e.
> not add Perl as a build-time dependency?
I'd certainly rather see Python used, unless there's a really good reason
not to. I'm not sure if building Linux already requires Perl? It looks to me
like it doesn't, unless you build the raid6 drivers.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |