|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code
Hi,
At 16:36 -0400 on 13 Aug (1155486984), Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:
> I tried bringing up as many x86_32 UP WinXP domains as I could. I found
> that the qemu-dm process associated with each domain took up 50% cpu.
Are you auto-ballooing memory from dom0 for these domains? One failure
mode of the memory allocation bug is that there is enough memory to
start the domain but not enough for qemu-dm to allocate its video card.
The domain then falls back to the much more cpu-intensive VGA support.
> Bringing up a domain with pae=1 crashes the system. I have attached the
> output. I tried this with a Win2003 server image.
Thanks; this is a known bug but the fix didn't make it into that
patch. :(
> I could not bring up any x86_64 domains. When I tried a SLES10 x86_64
> image I got a message saying "Your CPU does not support long mode. Use a
> 32-bit distribution"
I'll look into that; sounds like the results of CPUID are confusing the
linux kernel.
Cheers,
Tim.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Steve Dobbelstein
|
|
|
|
|