xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code
At 15:48 -0400 on 11 Aug (1155311280), James Morris wrote:
> Have you considered using binary patching (similar to the paravirt_ops
> technique), so that the final shadow mode ops are invoked directly?
I don't think we would get very much benefit from it. In SMP HVM
guests, different vcpus can be in different shadow modes, so there would
still have to be a per-vcpu lookup to choose which mode to use.
Cheers,
Tim.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, James Morris
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code,
Tim Deegan <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] New shadow paging code, Tim Deegan
|
|
|