 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?
| To: | "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective? |
| From: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:47:02 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:55:37 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <0EBFB99D260C5B40AC33E0F807B1AD66CE79F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Aca9yABevSNKoKxKQoeZHIOaybJ/twALEKfO |
| Thread-topic: | Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective? |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 |
On 12/8/06 5:30 am, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 seem not effective, should we use > vmmcall instead since hvmloader is running in none-root vmcs mode? What do you think is the problem? Init_hypercall() sets up a hypercall transfer page suitable for the architecture you are running on (so it uses vmmcall when running on VT-x). There are a few example hypercalls at the end of that function which do work properly. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: RX_COPY_THRESHOLD in netfront, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?, Steven Smith |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Sparc support (patch/RFC), Blue Swirl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
