WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?

from [Steven Smith] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?
From: Steven Smith <sos22-xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:26:19 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sos22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 01:26:51 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0EBFB99D260C5B40AC33E0F807B1AD66CE79F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <0EBFB99D260C5B40AC33E0F807B1AD66CE79F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 seem not effective, should we use
> vmmcall instead since hvmloader is running in none-root vmcs mode?
It should be possible for a non-root vmcs to make hypercalls due to
changesets 10883 and 10911.  Is this not working?

Steven.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] Re: Unable to handle kernel paging request, Steve Traugott
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] Paravirtualised drivers for fully virtualised domains, rev9, Steven Smith
Previous by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?, Li, Xin B
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?, Keir Fraser
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy