* Adrian Bunk (bunk@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:00:01AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> >...
> > --- a/mm/memory.c Fri Mar 24 04:29:46 2006 +0000
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c Fri Mar 24 04:30:48 2006 +0000
> > @@ -1358,6 +1358,100 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struc
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_pfn_range);
> >
> > +static inline int apply_to_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
> > + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > + pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> > +static inline int apply_to_pmd_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
> > + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > + pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
> > +static inline int apply_to_pud_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> > + unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> > + pte_fn_t fn, void *data)
> >...
>
> Please avoid "inline" in C files.
>
> (gcc already automatically inlines static functions with only one caller.)
Sure, that's fair. The surrounding similar code follows the same format
as above, perhaps you plan to patch?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home