| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:24:13AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> I'm uncomfortable with this, even though it makes things a little
> easier now. For sanity I want to see netfront/netback explicitly grok
> flags rather than dumbly pass them through. I'd prefer uint8_t protocol
> and uint8_t flags. Former is a protocol enumeration; latter is unused
> now but we can add ECN and so on later. By the way: will we need
OK.
> netback to advertise support for the ECN flag? I'm not sure exactly
> what it will mean, and whether it can just be ignored by netbacks that
> don't support it?
If netback does not advertise the flag then netfront will perform
segmentation before passing TCP packets with CWR set through.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home