| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:36:49PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> I'm not too bothered either way, but I personally prefer having the
> more properly qualified names listed under feature-gso. Pulling it
> apart with strstr() in netfront (for each proto that netfront can deal
> with) wouldn't be hard.
I can call it feature-gso-tcpv4, feature-gso-udpv4, etc.
> Do we then need the 'type' at all? What is it actually used for -- I'd
> assume the network stack would demux to the correct protocol code as it
> would for any ordinary packet, so why does it need help with the
> protocol for GSO packets?
Good point. I'll get rid of it.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home