|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq
>Keir Fraser wrote:
>> No, it would update a RAM virtual linear framebuffer which it would
>> share with backend code running in domain 0.
>>
>OK, understood. But then we still need to periodically update screen
>to flush guest frame buffer out like 'updates graphics' did in
>current code.
>In the meantime, we need to share part of VGA internal state between
>Qemu and Xen like graphic mode, bpp, palettes, screen
>width/height etc,
>and maybe dirty frame buffer track for fast flush out.
>
>Yes, that definitely helps standard VGA but no meaning for
>cirrus logic:-(
>For cirrus logic, the frame buffer is directly mapped to guest so that
>guest write of frame buffer will not trigger VM EXIT (page fault).
>
>
>I am not sure if it is worth to moving VGA to Xen? The
>standard VGA is rarely used.
>thx,eddie
>
So, what's the conclusion?
-Xin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq,
Li, Xin B <=
|
|
|
|
|