|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq
Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> Yes, we'd just move the whole lot of the logic. I'm not sure it's a
> good idea, but thought it worth suggesting.
OK, understand. Then it will be a lot of code movement.
>
> For example -- I know that qemu 'updates graphics' on a polling timer
> loop. Would we need to have that in Xen to produce the final linear
> frame buffer, or could the VGA device model easily keep the
> framebuffer up to date as it goes (ie., on every mmio or port write)?
I may understand mistakely, I am not clear how Xen can manipulate
HW frame buffer. It is under control of X-Windows or VNC server.
> If the former, it's not very attractive to put in Xen, but equally it
> would be nice to get rid of the polling loop whatever we end up
> doing. I'm unclear whether the polling is just for SDL/VNC updates.
>
> -- Keir
Eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Han, Zhu
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq,
Dong, Eddie <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
|
|
|
|
|