|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq 
| Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
> Yes, we'd just move the whole lot of the logic. I'm not sure it's a
> good idea, but thought it worth suggesting.
OK, understand. Then it will be a lot of code movement.
> 
> For example -- I know that qemu 'updates graphics' on a polling timer
> loop. Would we need to have that in Xen to produce the final linear
> frame buffer, or could the VGA device model easily keep the
> framebuffer up to date as it goes (ie., on every mmio or port write)?
I may understand mistakely, I am not clear how Xen can manipulate 
HW frame buffer. It is under control of X-Windows or VNC server.
> If the former, it's not very attractive to put in Xen, but equally it
> would be nice to get rid of the polling loop whatever we end up
> doing. I'm unclear whether the polling is just for SDL/VNC updates.
> 
>   -- Keir
Eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Han, Zhu
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq,
Dong, Eddie <=
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Dong, Eddie
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] patch to buffer write ioreq, Li, Xin B
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |