WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHl] localtime basis for paravirtualized guests

To: "Bruce Rogers" <BROGERS@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHl] localtime basis for paravirtualized guests
From: "B Thomas" <bjthomas3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:29:15 -0400
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:30:12 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Mu9zWyvilEdDX4vIzJXqn/emVjF4zZ/muaznt6DeJrteRcmox9jT2CNjq6aGJmVOr5uELEcho0uBIzXuvq5j40CV7bBMaND4Ih+I/dhdOGy63UV+qFcMrHAiGxcQqSY2Cfb+j3KkLRvogY9fKRCk5j1j04jh9j/dnYFD4F1ABZ4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <44982E5D.092E.0048.1@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D4B9F7C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4428F384.092E.0048.1@xxxxxxxxxx> <442D2D2D.092E.0048.1@xxxxxxxxxx> <268cbf4ac7bb43efa0994df4a124a19d@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <44982E5D.092E.0048.1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

Two quick comments/questions come to mind upon seeing this patch:

- it appears possible to set/reset the time offset multiple times even while the domain is running. Am I misreading the patch ?  Is this desirable ?

- this is a different mechanism than the one used to set time offsets for fully virtualized guests. At the lowest levels, this is probably difficult to avoid.  Higher up, though, it would be nice if this type of capability didn't look/act and be controlled differently.  The differences between fully and para virtualized systems should disappear the higher into the control logic you go.  Were you able to give any thought on how to merge the models ?

-b



On 6/20/06, Bruce Rogers <BROGERS@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Attached please find a patch (against unstable tree) which provides
some localtime support for paravirtualized guests.  It is quite
minimal
in its approach, satisfying the purposes of the paravirtualized
NetWare operating system as well as any others that expect the time
base to be provided in localtime.

I should point out however that this by itself does not allow a
localtime
time base to be used for xenolinux.  That support would require
additional
changes to Linux (eg a Xen aware implementation of /dev/rtc & etc.),
and
should probably be based on a more flexible and thorough implementation
of
non-UTC guest time bases than what this patch provides.  Nevertheless,
this patch is functionaly equivalent to what is being done SLES 10's
Xen
implementation (but with SLES10 being based on testing tree), so I felt
it
should be submitted as is, with a more comprehensive approach
submitted
separately.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers < brogers@xxxxxxxxxx>

- Bruce

>>> On 4/5/2006 at 8:03 AM, in message
<268cbf4ac7bb43efa0994df4a124a19d@xxxxxxxxxxxx >, Keir Fraser
<Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 31 Mar 2006, at 21:22, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>
>> This patch allows the localtime parameter to be used for
>> para-virtualized guests.
>> Some paravirtualized guests may need to start with a local time
basis
>> instead of UTC.
>> This patch provides for that need.  Please review and apply.
>
> I've just checked in a patch to provide a clean wallclock update
> interface from common Xen code. Please re-send based on that patch.
> Your dom0_op implementation should modify d->time_offset_seconds
> directly and then call update_domain_wallclock_time(d).
>
> Apart from that, the time_offset_seconds field in dom0_op.h should be

> type int32_t (we don't use s32 in public headers).
>
>   -- Keir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel