| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: PATCH: was Re**2: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: D
On 19 Jun 2006, at 16:20, Tristan Gingold wrote:
How does that ease binary compatibility if you want to add extra
common
fields later? You mean to have a pointer to the arch-dep struct?
Err, this was a bad argument. I was thinking about avoiding #if arch
/#endif
in this public header.
I'm not too concerned about a few ifdefs here and there in the header
files. I think sometimes it's easier just to have all the architectural
cases in one place rather than having to go to separate arch-specific
header files, even if it is "inelegant".
PS. The flag name: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP_ would actually be a fine prefix
for flags. Use whatever you prefer.
Here is the patch. I hope it looks like you expect it :-)
Looks fine.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home