WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: PATCH: was Re**2: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: D


On 19 Jun 2006, at 16:20, Tristan Gingold wrote:

How does that ease binary compatibility if you want to add extra common
fields later? You mean to have a pointer to the arch-dep struct?
Err, this was a bad argument. I was thinking about avoiding #if arch /#endif
in this public header.

I'm not too concerned about a few ifdefs here and there in the header files. I think sometimes it's easier just to have all the architectural cases in one place rather than having to go to separate arch-specific header files, even if it is "inelegant".

PS. The flag name: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP_ would actually be a fine prefix
for flags. Use whatever you prefer.
Here is the patch.  I hope it looks like you expect it :-)

Looks fine.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel