xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool
On 6/15/06, Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@xxxxxx> wrote:
I wouldn't call the amount of data 'huge'. Even on a very busy system,
where there are thousands of trace records being generated every second,
that's still a pretty small amount of data. (The size of a trace record
is something like 50 or 60 bytes.)
For the record, I think the trace record size in the trace buffers is
probably 32 bytes:
struct {
unsigned long long rdtsc; /* 8 */
unsigned long event; /* + 4 = 12 */
unsigned long data[5] /* + (4 * 5) = 32 */
};
The size on disk from xentrace is 36 bytes (it adds 4 bytes for the cpu).
If someone were really worried about copy time, one could write
something which uses raw disks (or, perhaps, the O_DIRECT flag) to DMA
data straight from the buffers to the disk. But I'm not really
worried about it at this point. :-)
Peace,
-George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-tools] RE: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, Ian Pratt
- [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, rickey berkeley
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, Rob Gardner
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool,
George Dunlap <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, Rob Gardner
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, Rob Gardner
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, Rob Gardner
- Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, George Dunlap
Re: [Xen-devel] Hi,something about the xentrace tool, Rob Gardner
|
|
|