WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem

from [Keir Fraser] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:18:51 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 May 2006 00:24:01 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4471D7EE.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D30484BDB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3fff45e9026898258afc2445c25d85c9@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4471B47A.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <4a7c24c6870aa1e8619e99a32a90c8c6@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4471BC98.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx><4471BC98.E57C.0030 <4471D7EE.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

On 22 May 2006, at 20:25, Ky Srinivasan wrote:


Under what circumstances was that the case, do you
know? It doesn't seem like the normal default case,
we've certainly not run into that one...

thanks,
Nivedita


Unfortunately I don't have the details currently. I will keep you
posted.
If we check in a floor that high it's almost certain to break xm-test and therefore our automated regression tests. There must be some underlying weird reason you seem to need such a high floor. 

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] xenoprof problem, Xin Zhao
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] Networking in dom0, Keir Fraser
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem, Ky Srinivasan
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] Question Also regarding interrupt balancing, harish
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy