WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem

To: "Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 17:34:45 +0100
Cc: Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:35:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D30484BDB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D30484BDB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 22 May 2006, at 17:31, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:

Will this patch be acceptable if the floor is removed and
xen_start_info->nr_pages is used instead of max_pfn?

The 192000 floor is just a bit bizarre. I wouldn't be sorry to lose that. But max_pfn is the right thing to use, not ->nr_pages, I think.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel