RE: [Xen-devel] performance problems...

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] performance problems...
From:	"James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:56:33 +1100
Cc:	Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:03:20 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcYYII3YsLF/BxqaSZq5O9bk9KXAugABrAEg
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] performance problems...

> 
> The default is 75% CPU for domain0, which would explain the unfair
> sharing. :-)
> 

I would have said that DomU had less than 25%, based on its nonexistent
performance.

Is it a generally held belief that this arrangement is a good thing? Or
does it just assume that I won't do anything silly like xen recompiles
under dom0?

Thanks

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] A question about SHARE_PFN_WITH_DOMAIN, Tian, Kevin

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] sedf scheduler may cause a CPU fatal trap, Guillaume Thouvenin

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] performance problems..., Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] performance problems..., Keir Fraser

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] performance problems...