RE: [Xen-devel] performance problems...

To:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] performance problems...
From:	"James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:18:25 +1100
Delivery-date:	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:25:05 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcYXQYdWKqqm5kZnSiG+GhRLwjDNdgAMU8FQABkguhAAAJdQsAABD52g
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] performance problems...

> are the guests SMP?

They are all SMP capable (default -xen kernel config), but except for
one they are all running with 1 vcpu.

> What does 'xm list' show about the relative CPU burn rates?

As I only rebooted recently I don't have any actual figures, but Dom0 is
highish (which makes sense as it was doing a compile), and DomU was low.
Neither had unexpected values in them.

If you can give me the syntax for rolling back to a specific changeset
or time (or I can look it up, but I'm sure you'll know it off the top of
your head :) I can start a binary search on when it all went wrong, and
definitely confirm that the problem didn't exist earlier.

Thanks

James


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] performance problems...