RE: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: [

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: [Xen-devel] Uses of &frame_table[xfn]
From:	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:16:16 +0800
Cc:	"Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:20:41 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcYMgB8wu+26GHKdTbi/iJqRpAHjfQAZrThg
Thread-topic:	Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: [Xen-devel] Uses of &frame_table[xfn]

>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年12月29日 21:48
>
>
>On 29 Dec 2005, at 01:59, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>
>>      IMO, I see the phys2mach mapping as a basic virtualization policy,
>> instead of an architecture specific requirement. After adding
>> phys2mach concept to XEN/IA64, we can reuse more common code without
>> ifdef. Then correspondingly also need to add several necessary changes
>> like x86: DMA, SWIOTLB, AGP, etc, to ensure legal machine address
>> written into physical devices.
>
>This seems to make sense to me. How does ia64/xen work right now?
>Machine addresses visible to domain0 and full virtualisation of
>addresses exposed to other domains (with no way of seeing underlying
>machine addresses)?
>
>  -- Keir

Yes, that's the current status: No way to see underlying machine address in 
other domains and thus no way for driver domains.

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] add "acpi" option in xmexample.vmxconfig file, Yu, Ke

Next by Date:

RE: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was:[Xen-devel] Uses of &frame_table[xfn], Tian, Kevin

Previous by Thread:

Re: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: [Xen-devel] Uses of &frame_table[xfn], Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

RE: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: [Xen-devel] Uses of &frame_table[xfn], Kevin Fox

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: [Xen-deve