| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: Guest-visible phys2mach part of Xen arch-neutral API? was: [Xen-deve
On 29 Dec 2005, at 01:59, Tian, Kevin wrote:
IMO, I see the phys2mach mapping as a basic virtualization policy,
instead of an architecture specific requirement. After adding
phys2mach concept to XEN/IA64, we can reuse more common code without
ifdef. Then correspondingly also need to add several necessary changes
like x86: DMA, SWIOTLB, AGP, etc, to ensure legal machine address
written into physical devices.
This seems to make sense to me. How does ia64/xen work right now?
Machine addresses visible to domain0 and full virtualisation of
addresses exposed to other domains (with no way of seeing underlying
machine addresses)?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home