|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Make it possible to run valgrind on code
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 06:20:06PM +0000, Xen patchbot -unstable wrote:
> diff -r c1c8da6f2afe -r 602aefe7bd48 tools/libxc/xg_private.h
> --- a/tools/libxc/xg_private.h Mon Nov 21 18:08:44 2005
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xg_private.h Tue Nov 22 15:31:16 2005
> @@ -15,6 +15,16 @@
>
> #include <xen/linux/privcmd.h>
> #include <xen/memory.h>
> +
> +/* valgrind cannot see when a hypercall has filled in some values. For this
> + reason, we must zero the dom0_op_t instance before a call, if using
> + valgrind. */
> +#ifdef VALGRIND
> +#define DECLARE_DOM0_OP dom0_op_t op; memset(&op, 0, sizeof(op))
> +#else
> +#define DECLARE_DOM0_OP dom0_op_t op
> +#endif
This is pretty ugly IMHO. Also, if someone does
if (foo)
bla;
else
DECLARE_DOM0_OP;
it breaks.
Is the micro-optimization of not initializing the structures to 0
worth it? I really doubt it. But if yes, please at least do something
like
#ifdef VALGRIND
#define DECLARE_DOM0_OP(name) dom0_op_t name = {
.cmd = 0,
.interface_version = 0,
.pad = { 0 }
}
#else
#define #define DECLARE_DOM0_OP(name) dom0_op_t name;
#endif
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Make it possible to run valgrind on code linked with the libxc libraries.,
Muli Ben-Yehuda <=
|
|
|
|
|