|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 23:41 +0900, NAHieu wrote:
> On 11/21/05, harry <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 14:49 +0100, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:18:24PM +0000, harry wrote:
> > > > o - I've reformatted all the code to the kernel coding style using
> > > > Lindent and not attempted to improve it after that. Some of the
> > > > formatting needs to be improved.
> > >
> > > some ? this is totally _not_ linux kernel coding style.
> > > please have a look at Documentation/CodingStyle and kill anonymous
> > > inline functions (braces in middle of functions).
> > >
> >
> > I have read Documentation/CodingStyle quite carefully and there is no
> > mention of using braces inside functions. I'm used to using braces to
> > define minimal scopes for local variables which makes the code easier to
> > read by minimising the number of variables you need to keep track of
> > when reading it and by declaring variables closer to where they are used
> > so it is easier to verify that they have been correctly initialised.
> >
> > Is this really banned?
> >
>
> I guess people complain because this is not a common practice. At
> least I never seen any code like that in the kernel.
>
> You could remove them because your functions are pretty short, and it
> easy enough to follow the code even if you put all the variables at
> the top of functions.
Yes, I can do this if necessary. I like to put a trace point at the
start of functions before declaring varibles because some variable
initialisations result in calls to other functions and having the
tracepoint first gets the trace log in the correct order. The
alternative is to put the declaration first and then initialise after
the trace point. I'm not used to 8 space tabs either. The braces for
nested scope don't really work well with such big tabs.
Lindent also messed up by putting the starting open brace for a number
of functions after the parameters rather than at the start of a new
line. There are also some problems from Lindent with parameter lists
being formatted in a confusing way. I need to go through and fix these
issues. I thought it was more important to get the code out for more
exposure and feedback on other issues than hide it away for another week
to fix the formatting perfectly.
>
>
> Hieu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, harry
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, harry
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, Dave Feustel
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, NAHieu
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series,
harry <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, NAHieu
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, harry
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, NAHieu
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, harry
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, NAHieu
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, NAHieu
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, harry
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, Anthony Liguori
- Re: [Xen-devel] USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series, Vincent Hanquez
|
|
|
|
|