Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] reenable pygrub build

[Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Christian Limpach wrote:

> I think this is a very poor solution.  Doesn't the name bzImage imply
> that the image includes a bootsector? 

On the contrary, the kernel that contained a boot image was
zImage - the bzImage (or big zImage) was for kernels too big
to boot that way.

> I don't see how we will be able to justify adoption of this hack when we 
> merge xen support into arch/i386...

I don't see how Xenolinux as a subarch of i386 could get away
with NOT having the same build target as other i386 subarchs.

-- 
All Rights Reversed

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel