 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] reenable pygrub build
| To: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] reenable pygrub build |
| From: | Christian Limpach <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:30:12 -0700 |
| Cc: | Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:27:34 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k4u7QweXwSN+vqBrOYxev5UwH+hU0ndIDDslCKpd+dFv+Aa9SL3fJ3RmtigFi8pZPa39FEKh3NYZSGxTmwNPyqZJlQzFtVy+wiJste6GY4EZpeaSQbUodNAmoAWwwuWFoT+mO9ANwLoFyYRqzf1Z8z+NSq7rrLNC4ryE/CgCzOQ= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510072057550.7290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0510072057550.7290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 10/7/05, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:
>
> > BTW: Have you guys got other patches to feed upstream?
>
> This is a hack for our kernel spec file. The Xen kernels are
> compiled as variants on i686 and x86_64, and the spec file is
> constructed in such a way that it has the same build targets
> for all the kernel variants within one architecture.
>
> This trivial patch adds a bzImage target.
I think this is a very poor solution. Doesn't the name bzImage imply
that the image includes a bootsector? I don't see how we will be able
to justify adoption of this hack when we merge xen support into
arch/i386...
christian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Seeing bridge issues, how do I tell what domU is using what interface?, Ted Kaczmarek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] who invokes device's probe function?, Ewan Mellor |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] reenable pygrub build, Rik van Riel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] reenable pygrub build, Rik van Riel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
