|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:36:25PM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> DB> Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly
> DB> more.
>
> Mostly what I meant was that there are fewer FAILs and more XFAILs,
> which there are. Also, on my machines, I'm seeing almost no
> unexpected failures. See my machine's latest report:
>
> http://xmtest.dague.org/cgi-bin/display?view=single&testid=99
Looking at this test result, I think that 07_attach_baddevice_neg and
08_attach_bad_filedevice_neg are going to stay XFAIL for some time, but the
patch that I gave you today should sort out the other failures, which will
mean that we pass every other test in your suite. Which is nice.
This applies to 32-bit, non-PAE, non-SMP Xen -- other architectures will have
different results, at the moment.
Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, (continued)
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, Li Ge
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, Li Ge
|
|
|
|
|