|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
 
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:36:25PM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> DB> Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly
> DB> more.
> 
> Mostly what I meant was that there are fewer FAILs and more XFAILs,
> which there are.  Also, on my machines, I'm seeing almost no
> unexpected failures.  See my machine's latest report:
> 
>   http://xmtest.dague.org/cgi-bin/display?view=single&testid=99
Looking at this test result, I think that 07_attach_baddevice_neg and
08_attach_bad_filedevice_neg are going to stay XFAIL for some time, but the
patch that I gave you today should sort out the other failures, which will
mean that we pass every other test in your suite.  Which is nice.
This applies to 32-bit, non-PAE, non-SMP Xen -- other architectures will have
different results, at the moment.
Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, (continued)
 
 
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, David F Barrera
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, Li Ge
[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds, Li Ge
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |